Letter to the editor: Shrink to fit

In response to “Fewer school districts can be better” (Editorial, Feb. 6): The exact same rational as outlined in the editorial can be applied to water agencies in San Diego County. There are 24 water agencies in San Diego County. Having served on two water agency boards, previously with Padre Dam Municipal Water District and currently with Otay Water District, I also see opportunities for efficiencies through mergers.

It is understandable why there are 24 water agencies when you look at how the county developed over the last 100 years. Years ago, the county had far fewer people and development was spread out. If you needed water, out of necessity you had to form a water district to be able to build the infrastructure to get the water. Now with most water districts abutting one another, it is hard to rationalize the need for so many agencies.

As the editorial points out regarding consolidations/mergers, we could gain efficiencies by eliminating duplicate staffing positions. When looking at water agencies we can also benefit from bringing different water utility functions together. Some water agencies have potable (drinking) water treatment capabilities. Others have expertise in recycled water, while others have experience in sewage treatment. There are other opportunities, utilizing the latest technologies to help drive down costs, subcontracting out nonessential services, and the ability to purchase materials on a larger volume (cheaper) basis.

So yes, let’s take a serious look at consolidations of school districts, water districts and other governmental agencies. – Mark Robak, Spring Valley